Inquirer Printing Co. v. Wehrly

27 A. 703, 157 Pa. 415, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1431
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 2, 1893·No. Appeal, No. 60·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Dean,

For the reasons given by him, the learned judge of the court below very properly declined to disturb the original judgment between the parties. But the facts and law involved in this .appeal are the same as in H. G. Smith & Co. against the same defendant, in which an opinion is this day filed. For the reasons therein given, the decree of the court below removing stay of execution in this case, on test. fi. fa., No. 16, January term, 1892, is reversed, and said execution is set aside, the costs on .said execution and on this appeal to be paid by appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inquirer Printing Co. v. Wehrly, 27 A. 703, 157 Pa. 415, 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1431 (Pa. 1893).

27 A. 703 (Inquirer Printing Co. v. Wehrly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Osenider
193 A. 284 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Mayer Furniture Co. v. Putt
3 Pa. D. & C. 542 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1923)
Justice v. Meeker
30 Pa. Super. 207 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)