Innovative Construction Concepts, Inc. v. 842 Manhattan Avenue Corp.

288 A.D.2d 186, 732 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10494

This text of 288 A.D.2d 186 (Innovative Construction Concepts, Inc. v. 842 Manhattan Avenue Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Innovative Construction Concepts, Inc. v. 842 Manhattan Avenue Corp., 288 A.D.2d 186, 732 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10494 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated October 24, 2000, which denied its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiffs allegations were sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (see, CPLR 3211 [a] [7]; Cron v Hargro Fabrics, 91 NY2d 362; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83; Kantrowitz & Goldhamer v Geller, 265 AD2d 529; Lien Law § 3; CPLR 3013). Ritter, J. P., Goldstein, H. Miller and Townes, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Leon v. Martinez
638 N.E.2d 511 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.
694 N.E.2d 56 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
Goldhamer v. Geller
265 A.D.2d 529 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 A.D.2d 186, 732 N.Y.S.2d 356, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/innovative-construction-concepts-inc-v-842-manhattan-avenue-corp-nyappdiv-2001.