Innotech, Inc. v. Martin Greshes

53 F.3d 345, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18640
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 1995
Docket95-1258
StatusPublished

This text of 53 F.3d 345 (Innotech, Inc. v. Martin Greshes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Innotech, Inc. v. Martin Greshes, 53 F.3d 345, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18640 (Fed. Cir. 1995).

Opinion

53 F.3d 345
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

INNOTECH, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Martin GRESHES, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 95-1258, 94-1483.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 30, 1995.

CORRECTED ORDER

Upon consideration of the parties' stipulated motion to dismiss,

IT IS ORDERED that

The judgment of affirmance without opinion entered on February 22, 1995, is vacated;

The mandate issued March 15, 1995, is recalled;

The notice of appeal is reinstated and dismissed under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b). Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F.3d 345, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 18640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/innotech-inc-v-martin-greshes-cafc-1995.