Innis v. State

New York Court of Appeals

Innis v. State

455 N.E.2d 483, 60 N.Y.2d 654, 467 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3362

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 20, 1983

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 455 N.E.2d 483 (Innis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Innis v. State, 455 N.E.2d 483, 60 N.Y.2d 654, 467 N.Y.S.2d 830, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3362 (N.Y. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs.

The determination of an application to file a late claim pursuant to subdivision 6 of section 10 of the Court of Claims Act is within the discretion of the court below. (Bay Terrace Coop. Section IV v New York State Employees’ Retirement System, 55 NY2d 979, 981.) Absent an abuse of discretion, not present here, that determination is nonreviewable by this court. (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals [rev ed], pp 353-354, 368-369.)

[656]*656Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI