Innes v. State

620 So. 2d 1233, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 386, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1085, 1993 WL 219768
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 24, 1993·No. No. 79902·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Innes v. State, 597 So.2d 966 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992), in which the district court asserted conflict with Lang v. State, 566 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We addressed the issue in this case in Sirmons v. State, 620 So.2d 1249 (Fla.1993). Accordingly, we quash the decision below and remand for proceedings consistent with Sirmons.

It is so ordered.

overton, McDonald, shaw, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. BARKETT, C.J., concurs specially with an opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Innes v. State, 620 So. 2d 1233, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 386, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 1085, 1993 WL 219768 (Fla. 1993).

620 So. 2d 1233 (Innes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lang v. State
566 So. 2d 1354 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Sirmons v. State
620 So. 2d 1249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Innes v. State
597 So. 2d 966 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)