Innella v. Salvation Army

25 Misc. 2d 1003, 209 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3587
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 9, 1961·Published

Opinion

James D. Hopkins, J.

The defendant’s motion for an order of preclusion is denied, on condition that the plaintiff serve within 10 days of the service of the order, with notice of entry, a verified bill of particulars in accordance with the demand. Although, under certain circumstances, a plaintiff may for the first time on a motion to preclude, question the propriety of the items demanded by a defendant of the particulars of a complaint (Esteve v. Abad, 50 N. Y. S. 2d 317, affd. 268 App. Div. [1004]*1004846), the appropriate procedure is for the plaintiff to cross-move for the relief sought, if it claimed that the items range beyond the particulars approved by practice, or to cross-move to be relieved from his default (Ferri v. Greater New York Brewery, 266 App. Div. 1005; Tomasino v. Prudential Westchester Corp., 1 A D 2d 781). Submit order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Innella v. Salvation Army, 25 Misc. 2d 1003, 209 N.Y.S.2d 880, 1961 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3587 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1961).

25 Misc. 2d 1003 (Innella v. Salvation Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferri v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.
266 A.D. 1005 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)
Esteve v. Abad
268 A.D. 846 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)