Inman v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Inman v. United States

154 F. App'x 355

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 16, 2005·No. No. 05-1377·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John Edward Inman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries he received in a single vehicle accident on a national forest road. The district court concluded it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and the discretionary function and independent contractor exceptions to the FTCA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Inman v. United States, No. CA-03-49-4-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

John Edward Inman appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries he received in a single vehicle accident on a national forest road. The district court concluded it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and the discretionary function and independent contractor exceptions to the FTCA. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Inman v. United States, No. CA-03-49-4-H (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Inman v. United States, 154 F. App'x 355 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

154 F. App'x 355 (Inman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.