Inland Harbor Homeowners Ass'n v. St. Josephs Marina, LLC

759 S.E.2d 80, 366 N.C. 376, 2012 WL 10973967, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1217
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided December 12, 2012·No. No. 156PA12-2·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

It appearing that the Court of Appeals has not addressed the issue, briefed by plaintiff and defendants on appeal, of whether:

The Trial Court erred in denying appellant’s [plaintiff’s] motion for summary judgment on appellant’s claim for judicial reformation of the deed, and in granting appellee’s motion on the same issue;

And it further appearing that in its PDR, plaintiff has restated the issue (Issue 3) to be briefed as follows:

Whether genuine issues of material fact exist precluding summary judgment for Appellee-Respondents on Plaintiff-Petitioner’s . . . deed reformation claim.

Plaintiff’s Petition for Discretionary Review is ALLOWED for the limited purpose of remanding to that court to address the issue. Defendant’s Conditional Petition for Discretionary Review is DISMISSED as moot.

s/Hudson, J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inland Harbor Homeowners Ass'n v. St. Josephs Marina, LLC, 759 S.E.2d 80, 366 N.C. 376, 2012 WL 10973967, 2012 N.C. LEXIS 1217 (N.C. 2012).

759 S.E.2d 80 (Inland Harbor Homeowners Ass'n v. St. Josephs Marina, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Am., N.A. v. Schmitt
823 S.E.2d 396 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2018)