Inko-Tariah v. Lappin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-6242
CHARLES A. INKO-TARIAH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; ART F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MONA HORTON, Supervisor of Education, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MARY ELLIS, Director of Nursing, Federal Medical Center, Butner,
Defendants – Appellees.
No. 09-6889
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons; ART F. BEELER, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MONA HORTON, Supervisor of Education, Federal Medical Center, Butner; MARY ELLIS, Director of Nursing, Federal Medical Center, Butner; BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:05-ct-00585-H) Submitted: September 8, 2009 Decided: October 7, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles A. Inko-Tariah, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Inko-Tariah appeals the dismissal of his
complaint alleging violations of Title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12131, et seq., Section
504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794, Bivens
v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403
U.S. 388 (1971), and North Carolina’s Handicapped Persons
Protection Act, N.C.G.S. § 168A-1, et seq. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Inko-Tariah v.
Lappin, No. 5:05-ct-00585-H (E.D.N.C. filed Apr. 6, 2006 &
entered Apr. 10, 2006; Jan. 30, 2007; Apr. 1, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Inko-Tariah v. Lappin (Inko-Tariah v. Lappin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.