Injah Tafari v. Selsky

47 N.E.3d 79, 26 N.Y.3d 1120, 26 N.Y.S.3d 750, 2016 NY Slip Op 63863, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 105
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 11, 2016
StatusPublished

This text of 47 N.E.3d 79 (Injah Tafari v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Injah Tafari v. Selsky, 47 N.E.3d 79, 26 N.Y.3d 1120, 26 N.Y.S.3d 750, 2016 NY Slip Op 63863, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 105 (N.Y. 2016).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Judges Stein and Garcia taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 N.E.3d 79, 26 N.Y.3d 1120, 26 N.Y.S.3d 750, 2016 NY Slip Op 63863, 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/injah-tafari-v-selsky-ny-2016.