Initiative v. King Cnty.
136 S. Ct. 1022, 194 L. Ed. 2d 376, 84 U.S.L.W. 3498, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2416, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 1842
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 7, 2016
DocketNo. 15–584.
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases
This text of 136 S. Ct. 1022 (Initiative v. King Cnty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Initiative v. King Cnty., 136 S. Ct. 1022, 194 L. Ed. 2d 376, 84 U.S.L.W. 3498, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2416, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 1842 (U.S. 2016).
Opinion
I see no sound reason to shy away from this First Amendment case. It raises an important constitutional question on which there is an acknowledged and well-developed division among the Courts of Appeals. One of this Court's most basic functions is to resolve this kind of question. I respectfully dissent from the denial of certiorari.
APPENDIX
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
James Eric McDonough v. Carlos Garcia
90 F.4th 1080 (Eleventh Circuit, 2024)
Scearce v. Ingram
W.D. Virginia, 2023
Am. Freedom Defense v. Suburban Mobility Auth.
978 F.3d 481 (Sixth Circuit, 2020)
Atu Local 1015 v. Spokane Transit Authority
929 F.3d 643 (Ninth Circuit, 2019)
Ctr. for Investigative Reporting v. Se. Pa. Transp. Auth.
337 F. Supp. 3d 562 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2018)
Pulphus v. Ayers
249 F. Supp. 3d 238 (District of Columbia, 2017)
Three Expo Events, L.L.C. v. City of Dallas
182 F. Supp. 3d 614 (N.D. Texas, 2016)
McMahon v. City of Panama City Beach
180 F. Supp. 3d 1076 (N.D. Florida, 2016)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
136 S. Ct. 1022, 194 L. Ed. 2d 376, 84 U.S.L.W. 3498, 44 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2416, 2016 U.S. LEXIS 1842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/initiative-v-king-cnty-scotus-2016.