Inhabitants on Truro v. Atkins

122 Mass. 418, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 146
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 27, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 122 Mass. 418 (Inhabitants on Truro v. Atkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inhabitants on Truro v. Atkins, 122 Mass. 418, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 146 (Mass. 1877).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

A plaintiff has the right to become nonsuit at any time before trial, but after the trial has been begun, he cannot become nonsuit, except by the leave and at the discretion of the court. Shaw v. Boland, 15 Gray, 571. In the present case, the trial having been begun, and the question of law reserved at the trial being still undisposed of, the ruling by which the demandant was allowed to become nonsuit as of right and of course, against the objection of the tenant, and without any exercise of discretion on the part of the court, was erroneous.

In Lowell v. Merrimack Manuf. Co. 11 Gray, 382, cited for the demandant, the case had been submitted to, and judgment rendered by, the court below upon an agreed statement of facts; the case had been brought to this court by appeal, which vacated that judgment; and the nonsuit was allowed by this court on motion, and before the opening of the case here.

Whether the Superior Court can allow a plaintiff to become nonsuit, after a question of law has been reserved on report for [419]*419the opinion of this court, and before that question has been disposed of by t.iis court, either by deciding the question, or by dismissing the report, is not presented by these exceptions, and we therefore express no opinion upon it.

Exceptions sustained, and nonsuit stricken off.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

French v. Brooke
241 Mass. 315 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Marsch v. Southern New England Railroad
126 N.E. 519 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
Earl Carpenter & Sons Co. v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad
68 N.E. 28 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Cunningham v. Davis
56 N.E. 2 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Wabash Railroad v. McCormick
55 N.E. 251 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1899)
Derick v. Taylor
50 N.E. 1038 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Johnson v. Bailey
59 F. 670 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin, 1894)
Washburn v. Allen
77 Me. 344 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1885)
Burbank v. Woodward
124 Mass. 357 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 Mass. 418, 1877 Mass. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-on-truro-v-atkins-mass-1877.