Inhabitants of Wiscasset v. Inhabitants of Waldoborough

3 Me. 388
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided May 15, 1825·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Coukt

said that the pauper, though incapable of gaining a settlement in his own right, by reason of mental imbecility, might acquire one derivatively from his father; whose residence being in Wiscasset at the time of passing the statute, his settlement and that of his son were thereby transferred to that place. The bond, they said, could in no view be regarded as supplies furnished by Waldoborough, that town having neither paid money nor suifered damage to obtain it.

Judgment for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inhabitants of Wiscasset v. Inhabitants of Waldoborough, 3 Me. 388 (Me. 1825).

3 Me. 388 (Inhabitants of Wiscasset v. Inhabitants of Waldoborough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brookover v. Kase
83 N.E. 524 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1908)