Inhabitants of Winslow v. City of Augusta

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Inhabitants of Winslow v. City of Augusta

49 A. 1134, 95 Me. 58, 1901 Me. LEXIS 76

DecidedFebruary 19, 1901

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A. 1134 (Inhabitants of Winslow v. City of Augusta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Inhabitants of Winslow v. City of Augusta, 49 A. 1134, 95 Me. 58, 1901 Me. LEXIS 76 (Me. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover for pauper supplies furnished to Addie Spaulding, wife of Henry Otis Spaulding, and to tbeir minor children. The supplies are the same sued for in the suit of Winslow v. Pittsfield, ante, p. 58, and the case was submitted upon the same statement of facts as in that case. In Winslow v. Pittsfield, the court decided that the settlement of the paupers was in Pittsfield and not in Augusta. The decision in this case must, therefore, be for the defendant city.

Judgment for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover for pauper supplies furnished to Addie Spaulding, wife of Henry Otis Spaulding, and to tbeir minor children. The supplies are the same sued for in the suit of Winslow v. Pittsfield, ante, p. 58, and the case was submitted upon the same statement of facts as in that case. In Winslow v. Pittsfield, the court decided that the settlement of the paupers was in Pittsfield and not in Augusta. The decision in this case must, therefore, be for the defendant city.

Judgment for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A. 1134, 95 Me. 58, 1901 Me. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-winslow-v-city-of-augusta-me-1901.