Inhabitants of Western v. Inhabitants of Leicester

20 Mass. 199
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 15, 1825·Published

Opinion

To gain a settlement under St. 1793, c. 34, [see Revised Stat. c. 45, § 1,] by having an estate of inheritance or freehold of the clear yearly value of ten dollars and taking the rents and profits thereof three years successively, it is necessary that there should be an actual annual income, and that it should be each and every of the three years of the value of ten dollars.

The defendants filed exceptions to these instructions.

after citing Groton v. Boxborough, 6 Mass. R. 50, and Conway v. Deerfield, 11 Mass. R. 327, were stopped, the Court being clear that the instructions of the judge were correct on both points.1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inhabitants of Western v. Inhabitants of Leicester, 20 Mass. 199 (Mass. 1825).

20 Mass. 199 (Inhabitants of Western v. Inhabitants of Leicester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Inhabitants of Groton v. Inhabitants of Boxborough
6 Mass. 50 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1809)
Inhabitants of Conway v. Inhabitants of Deerfield
11 Mass. 327 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1814)