Inhabitants of Vassalborough
19 Me. 338
Opinion
There is strong reason to apprehend that some improper steps were taken to procure the acceptance of the location of the highway complained of. It is not, however, every irregularity, or even illegality, which may have arisen in such a matter, that imperatively urges the discretion of a Court to grant a certiorari. And in this case, it seems to us, that the weight of authorities is against our interference. The ¡certiorari is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Inhabitants of Vassalborough, 19 Me. 338 (Me. 1841).
19 Me. 338 (Inhabitants of Vassalborough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Curtis v. Town Board of Geneva
82 N.W. 550 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1900)