INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler
This text of 457 A.2d 1122 (INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
In this action the Defendant, Hadley R. Chandler, appeals a judgment of the Superior Court (Somerset County) entered October 20, 1982, which vacated a decision by the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals holding that a mobile home park owned by the Defendant constituted a nonconforming use under the Pittsfield zoning ordinance. The Superior Court remanded the case to the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals, directing a further remand to the Town’s Planning Board for a hearing on the special exception permit application originally filed by the Defendant.
It is well-established that Superior Court judgments which vacate and remand *1123 for further proceedings are interlocutory in nature and are not final judgments reviewable by this Court. Harris Baking Company v. Maine Employment Security Commission, 457 A.2d 427, 428 (Me.1983); Mac-Dougall v. MacDougall, 403 A.2d 783, 784 (Me.1979).
Accordingly, the entry is:
Appeal dismissed.
All concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
457 A.2d 1122, 1983 Me. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-the-town-of-pittsfield-v-chandler-me-1983.