INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler

457 A.2d 1122, 1983 Me. LEXIS 664
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided April 4, 1983·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

In this action the Defendant, Hadley R. Chandler, appeals a judgment of the Superior Court (Somerset County) entered October 20, 1982, which vacated a decision by the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals holding that a mobile home park owned by the Defendant constituted a nonconforming use under the Pittsfield zoning ordinance. The Superior Court remanded the case to the Pittsfield Zoning Board of Appeals, directing a further remand to the Town’s Planning Board for a hearing on the special exception permit application originally filed by the Defendant.

It is well-established that Superior Court judgments which vacate and remand *1123 for further proceedings are interlocutory in nature and are not final judgments reviewable by this Court. Harris Baking Company v. Maine Employment Security Commission, 457 A.2d 427, 428 (Me.1983); Mac-Dougall v. MacDougall, 403 A.2d 783, 784 (Me.1979).

Accordingly, the entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler, 457 A.2d 1122, 1983 Me. LEXIS 664 (Me. 1983).

457 A.2d 1122 (INHABITANTS OF THE TOWN OF PITTSFIELD v. Chandler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarbuck v. Jaeckel
2000 ME 105 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 2000)
Harding v. Commissioner of Marine Resources
510 A.2d 533 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1986)
Chandler v. Town of Pittsfield
496 A.2d 1058 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1985)