Inhabitants of Strong v. County Commissioners

31 Me. 578
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1850
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 31 Me. 578 (Inhabitants of Strong v. County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inhabitants of Strong v. County Commissioners, 31 Me. 578 (Me. 1850).

Opinion

Wells, .T., orally.

The petitioners allege certain irregularities and wrongs in the doings of the County Commissioners. That allegation we have not found it necessary to consider.

A certiorari can be issued only for the relief of some injured party. The town brings this process. And they object: —

1st. That no damage to the landholder was assessed. It does not appeal- that the town owned the land, and they cannot be injured in that respect.

2d. That only a part, instead of the whole road prayed for, was laid out. But that course is more favorable to the town, than if the whole had been laid out. They have less road to make, and less damage to pay. To grant this petition would be a palpable violation of the rule, that such complaintj except made by a party injured, cannot be sustained.

Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Sullivan v. Drake
109 N.W. 982 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)
State ex rel. Milwaukee Medical College v. Chittenden
107 N.W. 500 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 Me. 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-strong-v-county-commissioners-me-1850.