Inhabitants of Shelburne v. Inhabitants of Buckland

124 Mass. 117, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 245
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 1, 1878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Colt, J.

The overseers of Shelburne gave a written notice, which was sufficient under the Gen. Sts. o. 70, § 17, to require from the overseers of the defendant town a written answer, within two months after its receipt. No written answer was returned, and by the terms of the statute the defendant, by this omission, is barred from contesting the question of settlement in this action. Gen. Sts. o. 70, § 18. New Bedford v. Hingham, 117 Mass. 445. The notice in the case at bar follows the form of the notice in Lynn v. Newburyport, 5 Allen, 545, which was there held sufficient. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inhabitants of Shelburne v. Inhabitants of Buckland, 124 Mass. 117, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 245 (Mass. 1878).

124 Mass. 117 (Inhabitants of Shelburne v. Inhabitants of Buckland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stillwell v. Kennedy
5 N.Y.S. 407 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)