Inhabitants of Rockport v. City of Rockland
This text of 89 A. 72 (Inhabitants of Rockport v. City of Rockland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Two actions tried together to recover from the defendant city, one for pauper supplies furnished by the plaintiff town to George L. Barter and family from December 24, 1908 to June 16, 1910, and for funeral expenses •of said Barter in June, 1910; the other for pauper supplies furnished [586]*586to Mary A. Barter, his widow, from June 17, 1910 to October 1, 1910. Verdict for plaintiff in both cases. Defendant filed exceptions and motion for new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions. Motion for new trial sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 A. 72, 111 Me. 585, 1913 Me. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-rockport-v-city-of-rockland-me-1913.