Inhabitants of Rockport v. City of Rockland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Inhabitants of Rockport v. City of Rockland

89 A. 72, 111 Me. 585, 1913 Me. LEXIS 143

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided December 23, 1913·Published

Opinion

Two actions tried together to recover from the defendant city, one for pauper supplies furnished by the plaintiff town to George L. Barter and family from December 24, 1908 to June 16, 1910, and for funeral expenses •of said Barter in June, 1910; the other for pauper supplies furnished [586]*586to Mary A. Barter, his widow, from June 17, 1910 to October 1, 1910. Verdict for plaintiff in both cases. Defendant filed exceptions and motion for new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions. Motion for new trial sustained.

L. M. Staples, for plaintiff. E. K. Gould, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Two actions tried together to recover from the defendant city, one for pauper supplies furnished by the plaintiff town to George L. Barter and family from December 24, 1908 to June 16, 1910, and for funeral expenses •of said Barter in June, 1910; the other for pauper supplies furnished [586]*586to Mary A. Barter, his widow, from June 17, 1910 to October 1, 1910. Verdict for plaintiff in both cases. Defendant filed exceptions and motion for new trial. It is unnecessary to consider the exceptions. Motion for new trial sustained.

L. M. Staples, for plaintiff. E. K. Gould, for defendant.

Inhabitants of Rockport v. City of Rockland, 89 A. 72, 111 Me. 585, 1913 Me. LEXIS 143 (Me. 1913).

Pincite

89 A. 72 (Inhabitants of Rockport v. City of Rockland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.