Inhabitants of Milford v. Inhabitants of Bellingham

16 Mass. 108
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1819
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 16 Mass. 108 (Inhabitants of Milford v. Inhabitants of Bellingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inhabitants of Milford v. Inhabitants of Bellingham, 16 Mass. 108 (Mass. 1819).

Opinion

The Court

stopped Lincoln, who was to have argued for the defendants, and observed that the declarations objected to were in the nature of facts, tending to show the intentions of the parties in certain transactions, which were substantiated by other evidence; and so may be considered as constituting a part of the res gesta. The fact to be proved was the transfer of the slave. The change of possession was established. The declarations of the parties * went to show the intent, with which that change [ * 110 ] had been made. This is not within the notion of hearsay evidence. The master of a young slave delivers her to anothei person, declaring his purpose, viz. to give her to his granddaughter; the husband of the granddaughter afterwards takes the slave, and [94]*94says she had been given to his wife. These declarations were proper evidence to show the nature of the possession in the granddaughter.

A bill of sale, or other formal instrument, was not necessary to transfer the property in a slave, which was a mere personal chattel, and might pass, as other chattels, by delivery.

Judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Watkins v. Young
31 Va. 84 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1878)
Woolery v. Woolery
29 Ind. 249 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1868)
Smith v. Maine & Bentley
25 Barb. 33 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
Goodrich v. Longley
70 Mass. 379 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1855)
Holbrook, Carter & Co. v. Murray
20 Vt. 525 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1848)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Mass. 108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-milford-v-inhabitants-of-bellingham-mass-1819.