Inhabitants of Kingfield v. Pullen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Inhabitants of Kingfield v. Pullen

54 Me. 398

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1867·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Daneorth, J.

Neither a party nor a witness can be allowed travel béyond the line of the State. Therefore the exceptions must be sustained, and the bill of cost corrected so as to allow travel from the line of the State.

Appleton, C. J., Kent, Walton, Barrows and Tapley, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inhabitants of Kingfield v. Pullen, 54 Me. 398 (Me. 1867).

Pincite

54 Me. 398 (Inhabitants of Kingfield v. Pullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related