Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks

133 N.E. 629, 240 Mass. 253, 1922 Mass. LEXIS 754
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 14, 1922
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 N.E. 629 (Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks, 133 N.E. 629, 240 Mass. 253, 1922 Mass. LEXIS 754 (Mass. 1922).

Opinion

Rugg, C. J.

These are bills in equity brought by municipalities against the commissioner of banks, who is in possession of the Tremont Trust Company under authority of G. L. c. 167, §' 22. The plaintiffs were depositors in that institution when it was closed on February 17, 1921. They seek to establish a preference for themselves in the payment of their claims over other depositors. Every contention put forward in behalf of the plaintiffs is settled adversely to them by Commonwealth v. Commissioner of Banks, ante, 244, just decided. In each case the entry must be

Decree dismissing bill affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commissioner of Banks v. Highland Trust Co.
186 N.E. 229 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 N.E. 629, 240 Mass. 253, 1922 Mass. LEXIS 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-framingham-v-commissioner-of-banks-mass-1922.