Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks

133 N.E. 629, 240 Mass. 253, 1922 Mass. LEXIS 754
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 14, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Rugg, C. J.

These are bills in equity brought by municipalities against the commissioner of banks, who is in possession of the Tremont Trust Company under authority of G. L. c. 167, §' 22. The plaintiffs were depositors in that institution when it was closed on February 17, 1921. They seek to establish a preference for themselves in the payment of their claims over other depositors. Every contention put forward in behalf of the plaintiffs is settled adversely to them by Commonwealth v. Commissioner of Banks, ante, 244, just decided. In each case the entry must be

Decree dismissing bill affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks, 133 N.E. 629, 240 Mass. 253, 1922 Mass. LEXIS 754 (Mass. 1922).

133 N.E. 629 (Inhabitants of Framingham v. Commissioner of Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commissioner of Banks v. Highland Trust Co.
186 N.E. 229 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)