Inhabitants of Fairhaven v. Howland

103 N.E. 302, 216 Mass. 149, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1372
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1913
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 N.E. 302 (Inhabitants of Fairhaven v. Howland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inhabitants of Fairhaven v. Howland, 103 N.E. 302, 216 Mass. 149, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1372 (Mass. 1913).

Opinion

Sheldon, J.

The fact that the Probate Court had appointed a guardian of this child with the custody of his person did not relieve the defendant, his grandfather, from liability for his support under R. L. c. 81, §§ 9-11. No provision for such relief can be found in the statutes. If the child’s parents had been living, and the need had arisen, the defendant would still have been liable. If he desired to furnish the support in his own house, his remedy was under § 13 of the same statute. The New York de[152]*152cisions which have been cited were rendered under statutes differing from ours, and are not applicable here.

The evidence warranted findings that the defendant was of sufficient ability to contribute to the support of the child, and that the amount assessed upon him was reasonable, having regard to-his present ability. Templeton v. Stratton, 128 Mass. 137.

The order made in the Superior Court must stand.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Treasurer & Receiver General v. Sermini
118 N.E. 331 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 N.E. 302, 216 Mass. 149, 1913 Mass. LEXIS 1372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-fairhaven-v-howland-mass-1913.