Inhabitants of Deerfield v. Nims

110 Mass. 115
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1872·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Chapman, C. J.

The bill seeks to obtain payment of a judgment and execution which the plaintiffs have obtained against the Proprietors of Deerfield Bridge, a corporation. It appears that, though the corporation is named in the bill, yet no process is prayed for against it or served upon it, but the suit is against several persons who are sued as stockholders. They demur on several grounds, one of which is that the corporation is not joined as defendant. This ground is valid; for as the corporation is the alleged debtor, it is a necessary party, for the reasons stated in Lyman v. Bonney, 101 Mass. 562. The other grounds ought not to be discussed till the corporation is brought in, for it should have an opportunity to be heard on these matters.

Demurrer sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Inhabitants of Deerfield v. Nims, 110 Mass. 115 (Mass. 1872).

110 Mass. 115 (Inhabitants of Deerfield v. Nims) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Homestead Mining Co. v. Reynolds
30 Colo. 330 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1902)
Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. Frank
148 U.S. 603 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Dormitzer v. Illinois & St. Louis Bridge Co.
6 F. 217 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1881)