Inhabitants of Boston v. Inhabitants of Wells
This text of 14 Mass. 384 (Inhabitants of Boston v. Inhabitants of Wells) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To gain a settlement in the fourth method described m the statute of 1793, c. 34, § 2, a citizen must dwell m the town the same three years that he holds therein an estate of freehold of the prescribed value.
Richardson
contended that it is a sufficient compliance with the statute, that the party resides in the town three years, and receives the whole rents and profits of an estate owned by him, and whose annual income is more than ten dollars, for the three years. Had the * legislature intended a perfect concurrence of the three requisites, another mode of expression would have been used.
At the last July term in Plymouth, the Court ordered a new trial, on the ground taken by the counsel for the plaintiffs, viz., that a settlement is to be gained in the fourth manner provided in the statute
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Mass. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-boston-v-inhabitants-of-wells-mass-1817.