Inhabitants of Athol v. Inhabitants of Watertown

24 Mass. 42
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 4, 1828
StatusPublished

This text of 24 Mass. 42 (Inhabitants of Athol v. Inhabitants of Watertown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Inhabitants of Athol v. Inhabitants of Watertown, 24 Mass. 42 (Mass. 1828).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The pauper has not had a residence for ten years, either actual or constructive, in the town of New Salem. There is no evidence, that when he absconded, he had animus revertendi. The inhabitants of Watertown must be defaulted ; and in the action against New Salem the plaintiffs must become nonsuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Mass. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inhabitants-of-athol-v-inhabitants-of-watertown-mass-1828.