Inguaggiato v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Inguaggiato v. State

799 So. 2d 1097, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15192, 2001 WL 1334743

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 31, 2001

DocketNo. 2D01-2570

StatusPublished

This text of 799 So. 2d 1097 (Inguaggiato v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Inguaggiato v. State, 799 So. 2d 1097, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15192, 2001 WL 1334743 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

STRINGER, Judge.

Francis Inguaggiato appeals the summary denial of his motion for additional jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, he stated the trial court awarded him 149 days of credit in lower court case numbers 99-21891 and 99-22600. He alleged his sentences should be corrected because he was incarcerated for 216 days prior to sentencing in both cases.

The trial court denied Inguaggiato’s claim and attached a portion of the record which indicates Inguaggiato was incarcer[1098]*1098ated for 150 days prior to sentencing in case number 99-21891 and 208 days in case number 99-22600. Because the judgment and sentences in each case indicate the trial court only credited him with 149 days and 207 days respectively, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand with the direction that his sentence be corrected to award him one additional day of credit in each case.

In addition, if Inguaggiato believes the records provided by the trial court are incorrect, he may assert his right to any remedy available to him under rule 3.850. See Hamilton v. State, 752 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Reversed and remanded.

BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

STRINGER, Judge.

Francis Inguaggiato appeals the summary denial of his motion for additional jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In his motion, he stated the trial court awarded him 149 days of credit in lower court case numbers 99-21891 and 99-22600. He alleged his sentences should be corrected because he was incarcerated for 216 days prior to sentencing in both cases.

The trial court denied Inguaggiato’s claim and attached a portion of the record which indicates Inguaggiato was incarcer[1098]*1098ated for 150 days prior to sentencing in case number 99-21891 and 208 days in case number 99-22600. Because the judgment and sentences in each case indicate the trial court only credited him with 149 days and 207 days respectively, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand with the direction that his sentence be corrected to award him one additional day of credit in each case.

In addition, if Inguaggiato believes the records provided by the trial court are incorrect, he may assert his right to any remedy available to him under rule 3.850. See Hamilton v. State, 752 So.2d 133 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Reversed and remanded.

BLUE, C.J., and DAVIS, J., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

799 So. 2d 1097, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15192, 2001 WL 1334743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/inguaggiato-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack