INGRIM v. State
309 S.W.3d 842, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2010 WL 691945
Opinion
ORDER
Jason Ingrim appeals from the motion court’s denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 on the basis that his trial counsel was ineffective. Because Ingrim has failed to present any evidence of prejudice, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
INGRIM v. State, 309 S.W.3d 842, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2010 WL 691945 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
309 S.W.3d 842 (INGRIM v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. INGRIM
224 S.W.3d 26 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)