INGRIM v. State
309 S.W.3d 842, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2010 WL 691945
This text of 309 S.W.3d 842 (INGRIM v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
INGRIM v. State, 309 S.W.3d 842, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2010 WL 691945 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
ORDER
Jason Ingrim appeals from the motion court’s denial of his post-conviction motion filed pursuant to Rule 29.15 on the basis that his trial counsel was ineffective. Because Ingrim has failed to present any evidence of prejudice, the judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. INGRIM
224 S.W.3d 26 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
309 S.W.3d 842, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 244, 2010 WL 691945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingrim-v-state-moctapp-2010.