Ingrao v. Dewalt
This text of Ingrao v. Dewalt (Ingrao v. Dewalt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6018
JOHN J. INGRAO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STEPHEN M. DEWALT,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-1917-AM)
Submitted: September 29, 1998 Decided: October 14, 1998
Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John J. Ingrao, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
John J. Ingrao appeals from a district court order denying
relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). In
light of our recent decision in Pelissero v. Thompson, ___ F.3d
___, 1998 WL 559663 (4th Cir. Sept. 3, 1998) (Nos. 97-6156, 97-
6221), we affirm the district court’s denial of relief. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ingrao v. Dewalt, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingrao-v-dewalt-ca4-1998.