Ingram v. Warden

159 A.2d 853, 222 Md. 621
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 1, 1998
Docket[P.C. No. 98, September Term, 1959.]
StatusPublished

This text of 159 A.2d 853 (Ingram v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. Warden, 159 A.2d 853, 222 Md. 621 (Md. 1998).

Opinion

222 Md. 621 (1960)
159 A.2d 853

INGRAM
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[P.C. No. 98, September Term, 1959.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 18, 1960.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

This is the second application of Thomas Richard Ingram for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act from judgment and sentence of eight years for attempt to commit statutory burglary, to which he pleaded guilty in 1956 in the Criminal Court of Baltimore.

The applicant shows no grounds for relief that could not reasonably have been raised in his first application for relief under the Act, as Code (1959 Supp.), Art. 27, Sec. 645H requires if a second application is to be entertained. Judge Warnken so found in his full and sound opinion below, and the application for leave to appeal is denied for the reasons set forth in that opinion.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burke v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
159 A.2d 853 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 A.2d 853, 222 Md. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-warden-md-1998.