Ingram v. Warden

149 A.2d 915, 219 Md. 690, 1959 Md. LEXIS 403
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedApril 10, 1959
DocketP. C. No. 7
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 A.2d 915 (Ingram v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. Warden, 149 A.2d 915, 219 Md. 690, 1959 Md. LEXIS 403 (Md. 1959).

Opinion

Hammond, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This applicant for leave to appeal under the Post Conviction Procedure Act seeks to raise various points of invalidity in his conviction, mostly failure to appoint counsel, with resulting prejudice. We do not reach these points because the lower court made no finding as to indigency, which was alleged and sworn to, and did not appoint counsel as the Act requires in cases of indigency. As a result the case must be sent back. “We read the statute as requiring counsel to be appointed in every case in which the court is satisfied that the allegation of the petitioner that he is unable to pay the cost of the proceedings is true (unless petitioner voluntarily and [691]*691intelligently waived the right to counsel).” Byrd v. Warden, 219 Md. 681. See also Sutton v. Warden, 219 Md. 687.

Application for leave to appeal granted, and case remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ingram v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
155 A.2d 668 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A.2d 915, 219 Md. 690, 1959 Md. LEXIS 403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-warden-md-1959.