Home/D.C. Circuit/Ingram v. United States

Ingram v. United States

209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedJanuary 21, 1954
Docket11827
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 209 F.2d 818 (Ingram v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. United States, 209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 307 (D.C. Cir. 1954).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant waived trial by jury on a charge of violating the lottery laws, D. C.Code 1951, §§ 22-1501, 22-1502, 52 Stat. 198-199. She was convicted. She afterwards urged, in support of a motion for a new trial, that her trial counsel “refused to permit her to testify” and failed to introduce certain other testimony. In our opinion the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, and its judgment placing the defendant on probation is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trevor Cole v. Arthur M. Davis, Ronald F. Ham, Patricia G. Hooper, Thomas R. Miller, Sara A. Minor, June Montgomery, Jill Murray, and Debbie Rice
Supreme Court of Alabama, 2023
Frander v. Frander, Inc. v. Griffen
457 So. 2d 375 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1984)
JR McCLENNEY AND SON, INC. v. Reimer
435 So. 2d 50 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1983)
Doe v. United States Civil Service Commission
483 F. Supp. 539 (S.D. New York, 1980)
Narragansett Tribe of Indians v. Murphy
426 F. Supp. 132 (D. Rhode Island, 1976)
United States v. Theodore J. Isaacs and Otto Kerner, Jr.
493 F.2d 1124 (Seventh Circuit, 1974)
Lee T. Lovallo v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army and Major General John Hightower, Commanding General of Fort Hamilton Complex
468 F.2d 340 (Second Circuit, 1972)
Luther Knight v. State of New York
443 F.2d 415 (Second Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Delta Development Co.
322 F. Supp. 121 (E.D. Louisiana, 1970)
United States v. Georgia-Pacific Company
421 F.2d 92 (Ninth Circuit, 1970)
Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air Force
411 F.2d 767 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Master Executive Councils of Pilots of Braniff Airways, Inc., and Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc., Lufthansa German Airlines and Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Master Executive Councils of Pilots of Braniff Airways, Inc., and Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc., Lufthansa German Airlines and Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenors
342 F.2d 905 (D.C. Circuit, 1965)
Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
342 F.2d 905 (D.C. Circuit, 1964)
State of California, United States of America v. Everett G. Rank
293 F.2d 340 (Ninth Circuit, 1961)
Pan American Petroleum Corporation v. Ed Pierson
284 F.2d 649 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Pierson
284 F.2d 649 (Tenth Circuit, 1960)
Wade McNeil v. Fred A. Seaton, Individually and as Secretary of the Interior
281 F.2d 931 (D.C. Circuit, 1960)
Marks Food Corporation, a Corporation v. Barbara Ann Baking Co., a Corporation
274 F.2d 934 (Ninth Circuit, 1960)
John E. Day, Jr. v. Charles E. Wilson, Secretary of Defense
247 F.2d 60 (D.C. Circuit, 1957)
Kansas City Power & Light Company v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the Interior
225 F.2d 924 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 F.2d 818, 93 U.S. App. D.C. 307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-united-states-cadc-1954.