Ingram v. Town of Clarkson

219 A.D.2d 839, 632 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10898
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 29, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court improperly granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. In opposition to the motion, plaintiffs submitted evidence that, as the result of the accident, Cynthia M. Ingram (plaintiff) suffers from chondromalacia of the left knee and that her condition restricts her ability to squat, kneel, walk and stand. That proof is sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact whether plaintiff sustained a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Hulsen v Morrison, 206 AD2d 459; De Angelo v Fidel Corp. Servs., 171 AD2d 588; Akin v Estate of Patti, 149 AD2d 964; Mulhauser v Wood, 107 AD2d 1019, appeals dismissed 65 NY2d 637). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Calvaruso, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Green, J. P., Lawton, Callahan, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingram v. Town of Clarkson, 219 A.D.2d 839, 632 N.Y.S.2d 38, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

219 A.D.2d 839 (Ingram v. Town of Clarkson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. Buckley
244 A.D.2d 323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)