Ingram v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ingram v. State

257 S.W.2d 710

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 15, 1953

DocketNo. 26363

StatusPublished

This text of 257 S.W.2d 710 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ingram v. State, 257 S.W.2d 710 (Tex. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of selling flavoring extract for beverage purposes, knowing that the purchaser intended to use the same for beverage purposes, and his punishment was assessed at six months in jail.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. •

Opinion approved by the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELCHER, Commissioner.

Appellant was convicted for the offense of selling flavoring extract for beverage purposes, knowing that the purchaser intended to use the same for beverage purposes, and his punishment was assessed at six months in jail.

The complaint and information, as well as all matters of procedure, appear regular. The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, in the absence of which nothing is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. •

Opinion approved by the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 S.W.2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-state-texcrimapp-1953.