Ingram v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ingram v. State

257 S.W.2d 710, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2114

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ingram v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 Tex. Crim. 313 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 1953·No. No. 26362·Published

Opinion

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of flavoring extract for beverage purposes, knowing that the purchaser intended to use the same for beverage purposes, as denounced by Article 666-15, Section (11), Vernon’s Ann. P.C.; the punishment, a fine of $200.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

The proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRISON, Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of flavoring extract for beverage purposes, knowing that the purchaser intended to use the same for beverage purposes, as denounced by Article 666-15, Section (11), Vernon’s Ann. P.C.; the punishment, a fine of $200.

No statement of facts or bills of exception accompany the record.

The proceedings appearing regular, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Ingram v. State, 257 S.W.2d 710, 1953 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2114 (Tex. 1953).

Pincite

257 S.W.2d 710 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.