Ingram v. State

17 S.W.2d 1118

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ingram v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 Tex. Crim. 8 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 1929·No. No. 12649·Published

Opinion

MARTIN, J.

Offense, theft of property of the value of over $50; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bill of exception.

The record presents nothing for review, and the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined i>y the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARTIN, J.

Offense, theft of property of the value of over $50; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bill of exception.

The record presents nothing for review, and the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM. The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined i>y the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Ingram v. State, 17 S.W.2d 1118 (Tex. 1929).

Pincite

17 S.W.2d 1118 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.