Ingram v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ingram v. State

280 S.W. 1118, 103 Tex. Crim. 432, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 251

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ingram v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 113 Tex. Crim. 75 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 10, 1926·No. No. 9951.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction in the District Court of Shackelford County for selling liquor, punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment fully charges the offense, and the charge of the court submits correctly the law applicable.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction in the District Court of Shackelford County for selling liquor, punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception or statement of facts. The indictment fully charges the offense, and the charge of the court submits correctly the law applicable.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Ingram v. State, 280 S.W. 1118, 103 Tex. Crim. 432, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 251 (Tex. 1926).

Pincite

280 S.W. 1118 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.