Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Ingram v. State

Ingram v. State

229 S.E.2d 416, 237 Ga. 613, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1324
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 28, 1976
Docket31285
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 229 S.E.2d 416 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. State, 229 S.E.2d 416, 237 Ga. 613, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1324 (Ga. 1976).

Opinion

Jordan, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of escaping confinement after conviction, and armed robbery and aggravated assault during the escape.

1. Assuming that proper objection was made and ruled upon that appellant was dressed in "identifiable prison clothes” (neither of which is clear from the record), we find harmless error since appellant was being tried for escape and other crimes in connection with the escape. *614 Wiggins v. Hopper, 235 Ga. 85 (218 SE2d 826) (1975); Krist v. State, 133 Ga. App. 197 (210 SE2d 381) (1974). See Estelle v. Williams, — U. S. — (96 SC 1691, 48 LE2d 126) (1976).

Submitted June 25, 1976 Decided September 28, 1976. Robert Bearden, for appellant. Fred M. Hasty, District Attorney, Walker P. Johnson, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, for appellee.

2. The trial court did not err in admitting evidence of a prior conviction for armed robbery since proof of lawful confinement was a necessary element in proving the crime of escape. Code Ann. § 26-2501; Dixon v. State, 234 Ga. 157 (215 SE2d 5) (1975).

3. There was no error in denying appellant’s motion for directed verdict on the charges of armed robbery and aggravated assault. There was ample evidence to support the conviction for these offenses.

4. The other enumerations are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Gunter, J., who concurs in the judgment only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
422 S.E.2d 438 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Barton v. State
361 S.E.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1987)
Thomas v. State
345 S.E.2d 350 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)
Vowell v. State
330 S.E.2d 167 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Adkins v. State
297 S.E.2d 47 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
State v. Santerfeit
295 S.E.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Teague v. State
294 S.E.2d 690 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Prather v. State
279 S.E.2d 697 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Gillespie v. State
231 S.E.2d 154 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 S.E.2d 416, 237 Ga. 613, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-state-ga-1976.