Ingram v. State

810 So. 2d 1042, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3039, 2002 WL 385010
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 13, 2002
DocketNo. 4D00-4501
StatusPublished

This text of 810 So. 2d 1042 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. State, 810 So. 2d 1042, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3039, 2002 WL 385010 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for purchase of cocaine and possession of cocaine. We reverse the special condition of probation requiring appellant to return to Utah to resolve a DUI charge. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734, 735 (Fla.1993).

STEVENSON, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Biller v. State
618 So. 2d 734 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
810 So. 2d 1042, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3039, 2002 WL 385010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.