Ingram v. State
54 So. 699, 173 Ala. 724
This text of 54 So. 699 (Ingram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ingram v. State, 54 So. 699, 173 Ala. 724 (Ala. 1911).
Opinion
As to the organization of the grand jury, the questions presented were decided adversely to the appellant in Patterson v. The State, 171 Ala. 2; 54 South. 696. The predicate for the admission of dying declarations was sufficient. — McEwen v. The State, 152 Ala. 38; 44 South. 619. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Woodard v. State
44 So. 2d 241 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
McGill v. State
55 So. 1037 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
54 So. 699, 173 Ala. 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-state-ala-1911.