Ingram v. State
54 So. 699, 173 Ala. 724
Opinion
As to the organization of the grand jury, the questions presented were decided adversely to the appellant in Patterson v. The State, 171 Ala. 2; 54 South. 696. The predicate for the admission of dying declarations was sufficient. — McEwen v. The State, 152 Ala. 38; 44 South. 619. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingram v. State, 54 So. 699, 173 Ala. 724 (Ala. 1911).
54 So. 699 (Ingram v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Woodard v. State
44 So. 2d 241 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
McGill v. State
55 So. 1037 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1911)