Ingram v. Insurance Co. of North America

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Ingram v. Insurance Co. of North America

594 So. 2d 988, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 4363, 1992 WL 25135

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 12, 1992·No. No. 89-1301·Published

Opinion

KING, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Great American Insurance Company v. Gaspard, 594 So.2d 981 (La. App. 3 Cir.1992), the judgment of the trial court is amended to increase the judgment awarded to Hanover Insurance Company against Skip Converse, Inc. and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company by $90,969.24, and, as amended, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are taxed one-half to Skip Converse, Inc. and one-half to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.

AMENDED AND AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KING, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the consolidated case of Great American Insurance Company v. Gaspard, 594 So.2d 981 (La. App. 3 Cir.1992), the judgment of the trial court is amended to increase the judgment awarded to Hanover Insurance Company against Skip Converse, Inc. and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company by $90,969.24, and, as amended, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are taxed one-half to Skip Converse, Inc. and one-half to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company.

AMENDED AND AFFIRMED.

Ingram v. Insurance Co. of North America, 594 So. 2d 988, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 4363, 1992 WL 25135 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

594 So. 2d 988 (Ingram v. Insurance Co. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related