Ingram v. Ingram

466 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 486, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12547
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 22, 1985·No. No. 84-1460·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals from the final judgment which dissolved the marriage of the parties. We affirm with one exception. The husband concedes that he gave the wife the sterling tea service and matching platter as anniversary gifts. Therefore, [293] paragraph 17 of the final judgment is amended so that those items belong to the wife. The rest of that paragraph and every other provision of the comprehensive final judgment are affirmed. Conner v. Conner, 439 So.2d 887 (Fla.1983); Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So.2d 13 (Fla.1976).

OTT, A.C.J., -DANAHY, J., and BOARD-MAN, EDWARD F. (Ret.), J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingram v. Ingram, 466 So. 2d 292, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 486, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12547 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

466 So. 2d 292 (Ingram v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Conner v. Conner
439 So. 2d 887 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1983)
Shaw v. Shaw
334 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)