Ingram v. Ingram

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Ingram v. Ingram

204 A.2d 572, 1964 D.C. App. LEXIS 296

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 1964·No. No. 3548·Published

Opinion

QUINN, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to amend a final judgment for divorce in her favor. The first part of the motion sought relief on the basis of a clerical error and the second part sought deletion of the word “plaintiff” in that portion of the judgment awarding maintenance to the “plaintiff and the minor child of the parties.” A review of the record discloses that the clerical error was corrected and that the inclusion of the word “plaintiff” was in response to appellant’s prayers for relief.

Appellant’s contentions are entirely lacking in substance and we regard the appeal as frivolous on its face.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

QUINN, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s motion to amend a final judgment for divorce in her favor. The first part of the motion sought relief on the basis of a clerical error and the second part sought deletion of the word “plaintiff” in that portion of the judgment awarding maintenance to the “plaintiff and the minor child of the parties.” A review of the record discloses that the clerical error was corrected and that the inclusion of the word “plaintiff” was in response to appellant’s prayers for relief.

Appellant’s contentions are entirely lacking in substance and we regard the appeal as frivolous on its face.

Appeal dismissed.

Ingram v. Ingram, 204 A.2d 572, 1964 D.C. App. LEXIS 296 (D.C. 1964).

Pincite

204 A.2d 572 (Ingram v. Ingram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.