Ingram v. Griffin

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7779

EDDIE INGRAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SERGEANT GRIFFIN, Shift Commander; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER KEPLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-05-622-2)

Submitted: February 14, 2007 Decided: March 2, 2007

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eddie Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eddie Ingram appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record, considered the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Jones

v. Bock, Nos. 05-7058/05-7142, 2007 WL 135890 (2007), and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Ingram v. Griffin, No. CA-05-622-2 (E.D. Va.

Oct. 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -