Ingram v. Eddington

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Ingram v. Eddington

83 S.W. 1132, 6 Indian Terr. 31, 1904 Indian Terr. LEXIS 4

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory·Decided October 19, 1904·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At a sitting~of the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, this 19th day of October, 1904, the same being one of the days of the regular September, 1904, term, present Hon. Charles W. Raymond, Chief Justice, Hon. W. H. H. Clayton, Hon. Hosea Townsend, and Hon. Jos. A. Gill, Associate Justices, W. P. Freeman, clerk, and George K. Pritchard, marshal, came on to be heard.the above-entitled cause upon the appeal; and it being found upon consideration by the court that no two justices of said court could agree as to how said appeal should be decided, under the statute, the judgment of the lower court stands affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

At a sitting~of the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, this 19th day of October, 1904, the same being one of the days of the regular September, 1904, term, present Hon. Charles W. Raymond, Chief Justice, Hon. W. H. H. Clayton, Hon. Hosea Townsend, and Hon. Jos. A. Gill, Associate Justices, W. P. Freeman, clerk, and George K. Pritchard, marshal, came on to be heard.the above-entitled cause upon the appeal; and it being found upon consideration by the court that no two justices of said court could agree as to how said appeal should be decided, under the statute, the judgment of the lower court stands affirmed.

Ingram v. Eddington, 83 S.W. 1132, 6 Indian Terr. 31, 1904 Indian Terr. LEXIS 4 (Conn. 1904).

Pincite

83 S.W. 1132 (Ingram v. Eddington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related