Ingram v. Double Envelope Corp.

5 Va. Cir. 120, 1983 Va. Cir. LEXIS 51
CourtRoanoke County Circuit Court
DecidedOctober 26, 1983
StatusPublished

This text of 5 Va. Cir. 120 (Ingram v. Double Envelope Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Roanoke County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram v. Double Envelope Corp., 5 Va. Cir. 120, 1983 Va. Cir. LEXIS 51 (Va. Super. Ct. 1983).

Opinion

By JUDGE ERNEST W. BALLOU

Plaintiff, Arbutus Ingram, sues defendant, Double Envelope Corporation, and individual management for wrongful discharge from employment and in five counts of her bill of complaint alleges various legal theories directly and indirectly attacking the Virginia employment at will doctrine: Count 1, employment at will, good faith and fair dealing; Count 2, promissory estoppel; Count 3, wrongful discharge; Count 4, infliction of emotional harm by reason of discharge of an at will employee; Count 5, individual defendants and corporate officers disrupted and interfered with her contractual rights.

Defendants demurred.

Virginia is an employment at will state, Plaskitt v. Blue Diamond Trailer Co., 209 Va. 460, 466-67 (1968); Griffith v. Electrolux Corp., 454 F. Supp. 29 (E.D. Va. 1978). Plaintiff, under Virginia law, was an employee at will and could terminate her employment, or be terminated, at any time. Her position was abolished and she was terminated. This complies with Virginia law.

The bill of complaint fails to allege a cause of action or any theory which overcomes the Virginia employment at will doctrine. Accordingly, the demurrer is sustained on all counts as to all defendants.

Counsel for defendants may submit an appropriate order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Plaskitt v. Black Diamond Trailer Company
164 S.E.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1968)
Griffith v. Electrolux Corp.
454 F. Supp. 29 (E.D. Virginia, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Va. Cir. 120, 1983 Va. Cir. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-v-double-envelope-corp-vaccroanokecty-1983.