Ingram Readymix, Inc. v. Southern Contracting, Inc., Steve D. Cervantes, Individually, and Continental Casualty Company

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 6, 2009
Docket13-07-00643-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ingram Readymix, Inc. v. Southern Contracting, Inc., Steve D. Cervantes, Individually, and Continental Casualty Company (Ingram Readymix, Inc. v. Southern Contracting, Inc., Steve D. Cervantes, Individually, and Continental Casualty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram Readymix, Inc. v. Southern Contracting, Inc., Steve D. Cervantes, Individually, and Continental Casualty Company, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-07-00643-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________

INGRAM READYMIX, INC., Appellant,

v.

SOUTHERN CONTRACTING, INC., STEVE D. CERVANTES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellees. _____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Yañez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 07-05189-00-0. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the

appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed

motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX .

R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent

agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed

the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our

mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 6th day of August, 2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ingram Readymix, Inc. v. Southern Contracting, Inc., Steve D. Cervantes, Individually, and Continental Casualty Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-readymix-inc-v-southern-contracting-inc-ste-texapp-2009.