Ingram Readymix, Inc. and Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 13, 2009
Docket13-09-00100-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Ingram Readymix, Inc. and Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn. (Ingram Readymix, Inc. and Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ingram Readymix, Inc. and Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion





NUMBER 13-09-00100-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________



INGRAM READYMIX, INC. AND SOUTHERN

CONTRACTING, INC. , Appellants,



v.



BENNETT, MARTIN, SOLKA AND TORNO, INC.,

GOVIND & ASSOCIATES, INC., AND

W.R. GRACE & CO.-CONN., Appellees.

______________________________________ ________________



On Appeal from the 319th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices
Yañez and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Ingram Readymix, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 08-6125-G. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the remaining parties to this appeal have resolved their disputes. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellant's unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.



PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 13th day of August, 2009.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Ingram Readymix, Inc. and Southern Contracting, Inc. v. Bennett, Martin, Solka and Torno, Inc., Govind & Associates, Inc., and W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-readymix-inc-and-southern-contracting-inc-v-texapp-2009.