Ingram, James Lee
This text of Ingram, James Lee (Ingram, James Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and sentenced to nine months' imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Ingram v. State, 02-05-00249-CR (Tex. App.-Fort Worth, April 13, 2006, pet. ref'd).
Applicant contends that he was convicted as a result of unreliable testimony. The State and the trial court recommended that this Court grant relief. This application, however, was not filed on the revised form designated for applications for a writ of habeas corpus filed under Article 11.07 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Accordingly, it is dismissed for noncompliance. Tex. R. App. P. 73.1.
Filed: March 18, 2009
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ingram, James Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ingram-james-lee-texcrimapp-2009.