Ingram IV v. Cuomo
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WILBERT INGRAM IV, Plaintiff, — against — RD 22 Misc. 147 (ER) QUEENS COUNTY THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.
RAMos, D.J.: Whereas Plaintiff filed this pro se action as a purported miscellaneous case (Doc. 1); Whereas Plaintiff’s complaint asserts claims for damages and injunctive relief (id. □□ Whereas Plaintiff’s complaint does not fit any of the listed categories of miscellaneous matter; The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to: 1. Open this case as a new civil action and assign the case to the Undersigned’s docket. 2. Administratively close this miscellaneous case. 3. Mail a copy of this order to the Plaintiff.
SO ORDERED. 2Q\) Dated: June 16, 2022 FE New York, New York Edgardo Ramos, U.S.D.J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ingram IV v. Cuomo (Ingram IV v. Cuomo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.